NASA Advisory Council expresses skepticism about OSP
Posted: Sun, Mar 23, 2003, 3:51 PM ET (2051 GMT)
An outside committee that advises NASA said last week that they believe plans to pursue the Orbital Space Plane (OSP) could be a step backwards for the space agency, the Orlando Sentinel reported. The NASA Advisory Council, meeting last week at NASA's Stennis Space Center in Mississippi, grilled a NASA official who outlined the agency's plans for OSP, a spacecraft that could be launched from expendable boosters to ferry crews and supplies to the International Space Station (ISS) and also serve as a crew return vehicle for ISS. Committee members called the OSP a "maintenance plan" and "life-extension program" for the agency, rather than an effort to develop new technology and expand human spaceflight. John "Row" Rogacki, NASA's associate administrator for aerospace, defended the OSP, saying it provided an alternate means for servicing the ISS should the shuttle be grounded again in the future. When asked by council member John Glenn why NASA doesn't build another shuttle to replace Columbia, Rogacki said the agency didn't want to be depended on a single transportation system, but also said the option of building a replacement shuttle was still being discussed.
An outside committee that advises NASA said last week that they believe plans to pursue the Orbital Space Plane (OSP) could be a step backwards for the space agency, the Orlando Sentinel reported. The NASA Advisory Council, meeting last week at NASA's Stennis Space Center in Mississippi, grilled a NASA official who outlined the agency's plans for OSP, a spacecraft that could be launched from expendable boosters to ferry crews and supplies to the International Space Station (ISS) and also serve as a crew return vehicle for ISS. Committee members called the OSP a "maintenance plan" and "life-extension program" for the agency, rather than an effort to develop new technology and expand human spaceflight. John "Row" Rogacki, NASA's associate administrator for aerospace, defended the OSP, saying it provided an alternate means for servicing the ISS should the shuttle be grounded again in the future. When asked by council member John Glenn why NASA doesn't build another shuttle to replace Columbia, Rogacki said the agency didn't want to be depended on a single transportation system, but also said the option of building a replacement shuttle was still being discussed.| <<previous article | next article>> |
|
news in brief
|
|
|
|
news links
|
|
Friday, September 5
Eutelsat Unifies Brand, Keeps OneWeb Constellation Name
ViaSatellite — 7:05 am ET (1105 GMT) Pentagon Doubling Down on Alternatives to GPS That Aren’t in Space
Air and Space Forces Magazine — 7:03 am ET (1103 GMT) Space Command team already in Huntsville to begin process of move to Redstone
Huntsville Times — 7:03 am ET (1103 GMT) California awards coalition of groups a grant to expand space-related development on the Central Coast
KCLU-FM Thousand Oaks, CA — 7:02 am ET (1102 GMT) FAA decision clears way to more than double Falcon 9 launches at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station
WFTV Orlando — 7:02 am ET (1102 GMT) |
